AI-Ethics FAQ for AI-generated Fashion Images

As AI-generated fashion images become a powerful tool across the industry, fashion brands and fashion educators are facing a new set of challenges and opportunities. AI is already delivering major benefits, including cost reduction, faster time-to-market, and enhanced creative possibilities. From virtual model photography to AI-generated collections, the technology is reshaping how fashion is developed and how content is produced.

But with this transformation comes the need for clear ethical standards and key questions are emerging:

• Who owns the rights to AI-generated fashion images?
• Are AI models trained on ethically sourced data?
• Should brands disclose when an image or model is AI-generated?

These issues are crucial for maintaining brand trust, legal compliance, and responsible innovation in fashion. Whether you're a brand using AI imagery or an educator preparing students for the future of fashion design, this AI Fashion Ethics FAQ provides the essential guidance on AI rights, data sourcing, and disclosure.

‍

1. Can I train a model on runway images I scraped online?

No, unless you hold a licence.

Action: buy or build a licensed dataset, never ‘misuse’ licensed sources. Training a model on runway images scraped online without permission likely infringes copyright, especially if the images are owned by professional photographers, media outlets, or fashion houses.

• EU: EU’s AI Act and global trends in AI regulation are pushing toward transparency in training data and requiring documentation of lawful data sourcing. European Parliament 
• US: Ongoing lawsuits, such as Getty Images v. Stability AI, argue that training on scraped images is not fair use. U.S. Copyright Office – AI and Copyright Policy

‍

2. Do I need consent if my avatar looks like a real model?

Yes.

Action: add a synthetic-likeness clause to every model release.

• New York Fashion Workers Act (2025) demands written permission to create or use a digital replica.
• Similar right-of-publicity statutes exist in Tennessee, California, and others.

‍

3. Do I need to disclose when using AI campaign images?

Sometimes, depending on the Geography

Action: Add information whenever applicable. Template copy:  “This image was created with AI-generated virtual models; no real people were photographed.”

• EU: AI Act (2024/1689)  “clearly and visibly mark AI-generated content.”
• US: 40+ states require labels on “materially deceptive” visuals in ads.

‍

4. Who owns copyright in a pure AI image?

EU & US regulators agree: if no human “creative choices” exist, full copyright falls away.

Action: keep a changelog of human edits; crop, colour grade, layout to reinforce authorship.

‍

5. How can educators use AI without legal headaches?

Classroom checklist

1. Use only licensed or public-domain datasets.
2. Make students credit the AI tool and label outputs.
3. Review  UNESCO AI-Ethics bias guidelines. 

‍

‍

Key take-aways

• Licence your data—no unapproved web scrapes.
• Secure likeness consent—treat digital doubles like real talent.
• Labeling “AI-generated image” is now a legal must in many regions.
• Document your human touch it may decide copyright ownership.
• Respect the creators, respect the subjects, respect the audience—that’s modern AI fashion ethics in one line.

‍

Contribute to bias-test our dataset

‍

At The Fabricant, we are committed to building AI systems that reflect the full spectrum of human identity and creativity. We continuously monitor to ensure diverse representation across cultures, body types, genders, and aesthetics, actively working to dismantle bias before it takes root. 

‍

If you ever encounter bias within our AI-generated outputs, we want to hear from you. Your feedback is essential in helping us build a more inclusive and representative tool. Reach out, speak up, and help us keep evolving together.

‍